Environmental Defence, along with the Council of Canadians and Transition Initiative Kenora, released a report yesterday about the risks of the proposed Energy East pipeline to our drinking water, and that of 5 million Canadians.
In Ottawa, the Energy East pipeline would cross the Mississippi and Rideau rivers, and travel along the Ottawa River upstream of the city, as well as the Oxford Aquifer, near North Grenville, that services 10 000 private wells. Over all, the report estimates that the pipeline puts 962 044 people’s drinking water at risk, in Ottawa alone.
Download the report here http://DrinkingWateratRisk.ca, and learn more about the unnecessary and reckless risk this pipeline poses to Ottawa.
Energy East is bad for our water, it’s bad for our city, it’s bad for our climate. Say no to Energy East. Sign our petition here:
Here is the official press release for the report:
For Immediate Release: April 6, 2016
New report shows Energy East pipeline would threaten drinking water of over five million Canadians, majority in Quebec
TORONTO, ON – Just two days after TransCanada’s Keystone system spilled yet again, a detailed analysis of the company’s proposed Energy East pipeline route shows that across Canada the Energy East project could lead to the contamination of crucial sources of drinking water not identified in TransCanada’s application.
“Protecting our most valuable resource – clean water – must take precedence over exporting dirty oil,” said Adam Scott of Environmental Defence. “Just one pipeline rupture in any one of the vulnerable locations that we identified along Energy East’s proposed route could contaminate drinking water sources for years to come. Canadians should not sacrifice our clean drinking water for oil companies’ profits.”
Over two dozen municipal regions across four provinces would face direct risks to their drinking water from Energy East which, if built, would cross nearly 3,000 water bodies. Over five million Canadians across Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec and New Brunswick draw their drinking water from sources within spill range and downstream of the Energy East proposed route. If built, Energy East would carry tar sands diluted bitumen, which a recent report by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences says can create even greater environmental risks when spilled.
“Access to clean drinking water is essential to community health, but Energy East would put that at risk,” said Teika Newton of Transition Initiative Kenora. “It’s unthinkable to add the threat of toxic oil pollution as a new risk to community drinking water supplies.”
For the first time, a study, Energy East: A risk to our drinking water, shows the magnitude of the threat Energy East poses to Canadians’ drinking water sources. Previous studies have warned of the safety risks a high-pressure oil pipeline of this size and scale would create for water in Canada, but didn’t provide this level of alarming detail.
“With a pipeline the size of Energy East, a major rupture threatens to be the largest pipeline spill Canada has ever experienced,” Andrea Harden-Donahue of the Council of Canadians added. “Diluted bitumen sinks to the bottom of rivers and lakes and sticks to everything it touches, making a full cleanup next to impossible. Energy East is simply not worth the risk.”
TransCanada is known for a poor safety record. In its first year of operation, the company’s Keystone system spilled 12 times. And the most recent spill, earlier this week, was detected by a passerby, again calling into question the effectiveness of the company’s leak detection system.
Energy East proposal by the numbers:
- Estimated numbers of Canadians living in the oil spill zone: 5,061,433
o Manitoba 676,613
o Ontario 1,040,788
o Quebec 3,213,353
o New Brunswick 130,679
- Total length of pipeline – 4,600 km
- 3,000 km – Converted old natural gas pipeline
- 1,600 km – New pipeline construction
- 1,100,000 Million barrels per day
- Water crossings – 2,963